Ruthless Knitting

Here’s a peek at the latest baby knit — a little cardigan called Harry. This is the back. The pattern was designed by Martin Storey for the most fetching book of baby knits I own, which is called (less fetchingly) Jaeger Handknits JB29. I’ve already finished one of the fronts, and I hope to finish the other today.

Because I have been a somewhat negligent blogger of late (too much work!), here are my responses to a meme for which Gryphon tagged me a while back.

1. What was I doing ten years ago?

I graduated from Grinnell College in May 1998, and then I headed straight to England, where I was an au pair for the summer in Harpenden, a small town to the north of London. When I got home, I picked up my stuff from storage in Iowa and drove to North Carolina, where I moved into my new apartment and got ready to begin graduate school. 

2. What are five things on my to-do list for today?

I am actively ignoring my to-do list, which contains a variety of uninteresting items. My true to-do list looks more like this: water plants, make lemon bars, take nap, knit cardigan front, make dinner. I have already achieved three of the five, and I’m on my way to do number four as soon as I finish writing this.

3. Snacks I enjoy:

Lemon bars and all sorts of other home-baked cookies, almonds, plain yogurt with a little maple syrup in it, corn chips and salsa, and apples with cheese are probably my favorites.

4. Things I would do if I were a billionaire:

Aside from some small house and landscaping projects, I can’t think of many things I want to do that I can’t already afford to do except "give more money away." I’d want to give money to historical organizations, public libraries, scholarships for high school students who want to go to college, and homebirth/midwifery organizations. No doubt I’d come up with other worthy recipients.

5. Places I have lived:

Pennsylvania, Ohio, Iowa, Oregon, Colorado, London, North Carolina, and Wisconsin.

My friend Rebecca had her new baby, Madelyn, yesterday. She is perfect and adorable. The dress will hardly do her justice.

Pattern: My own
Size: 3-6 mo. (16" chest, meant to fit snugly)
Yarn: Blue Sky Alpacas Skinny Dyed Cotton (100 percent cotton; 150 yds per 65 g skein) in mallard and maize
Yardage: 140 yds mallard, approx 100 yds maize
Source: Jimmy Beans Wool
Needles: US 5 (3.75 mm) circular needles
Gauge: 5.5 sts and 8 rows = 4" in stockinette stitch
Notes: Since Maddy is a summer baby, I designed this with the image in my mind of her hanging out on a pretty summer’s day by the inflatable pool, watching while her big sister splashes around in the water. I think it turned out pretty cute, given that I pretty much made it up as I went along.

I cast on provisionally for this dress and ended up knitting in both directions, first upward until I had finished the tube for the top, then downward for the skirt, and then upward again to make the straps. This method allowed me to (a) cast on an almost random number of stitches and knit for a while before deciding how many I needed to decrease for the top and (b) use up as much yarn as possible for the skirt part without running out.

I like the Skinny Dyed cotton okay — the colors, in particular, are just lovely — but it’s sort of a strange yarn. It seems to be made up of about a million teensy strands of cotton plied together with very little twist, and this means that you have to be careful to catch them all on every stitch. If you miss even one strand, your fabric will show it. Nonetheless, with pointy needles and in stockinette, this was not a big deal. I’d use it again for a baby garment.

Onward to the next baby knit! I have a little sweater in the works to use up leftovers. Stay tuned.

Pattern: Baby Surprise Jacket by Elizabeth Zimmerman
Size: 6-9 mo?
Yarn: Craftspun Bluefaced Leicester Aran (100 percent wool); Henry’s Attic Kona Superwash DK (100 percent superwash merino wool)
Yardage: 300-350 yds
Source: Yarns by Design, Neenah, WI; Catnip Yarns 
Needles: US 6 (4.0 mm) 24" circular needles
Gauge: 5.5 sts = 1" in garter stitch
Notes: I have been working a LOT lately, and I had to work last weekend, too, but I also needed to relax, and knitting this little jacket was, for whatever reason, the only thing I wanted to do when I had some time to take a break. Consequently, it knit up very quickly, and the process was fun. For those of you who aren’t familiar with this pattern, the important thing to know is that the whole sweater is knit in one piece, then folded up at the end and seamed across the top of the arms. Pre-folding, the knit piece of fabric looks truly bizarre, like a manta ray or something. As I followed the pattern directions, I was very interested in trying to work out what exactly I was knitting and how the jacket was going to take shape. Once I figured out where the arms were, it wasn’t too hard to understand the construction, though I still can’t quite imagine coming up with the pattern myself. Very clever, that Elizabeth Zimmerman.

I used the version of this pattern that appears in Zimmerman’s Knitting Workshop. The only trouble I had with it was figuring out how much yarn I would need: the pattern calls for 3 oz. of Shetland wool, which helped me not at all. (What weight is Shetland wool? Are we talking DK/sport, like Jamieson’s Shetland?) Luckily, I knew that the pattern was quite forgiving, so I decided to just dive in. I had 100 g (3.5 oz) of aran-weight yarn, which I figured might be on the heavy side, but I did get something approaching gauge with it, so off I went. It quickly became clear that 187 yds was not going to cut it, so I went in search of other yarns to use and came up with this bright blue yarn that I dyed last year. (I consider blue to be a gender-neutral color, by the way.) When I ran out of that, I used some undyed yarn of the same weight, which, thankfully, matched the undyed yarn that I started out with. It was all a bit of an adventure.

Some people churn out Baby Surprise Jacket after Baby Surprise Jacket. I can certainly see the appeal for using up leftovers, and it was the perfect pattern for me in the midst of a stressful time with work. In general, though, I don’t like to knit things more than once, and that much garter stitch would put me to sleep in normal conditions. It will be interesting to see if and when I decide to make another.

Next up, I’ve been working on a little cotton dress for my friend’s baby, who is due next week.

I’m actually knitting it from both ends at once, since my yarn supply is limited, and I want to make sure that I don’t run out. Progress has been fairly swift, so I’m hoping to have another little baby thing to show off early next week. The near-instant satisfaction of baby knitting is right up my alley these days.

I have (almost) finished the baby pants! I just have to put the elastic in the waistband. Aren’t they cute?

It’s good that they’re so very adorable, because they were a major pain to knit. Even though I was only responsible for 1.25 legs (Rebecca knit the entire seat and most of one leg), I have to be honest and say that I loathed the whole process nonetheless. It’s just not a good idea to knit with that many colors at once. I blame Dale of Norway, whose pattern this is. For the record, I did find the whole process more bearable on a single, short-cabled circular needle than on double-pointed needles.

One problem with knitting with five colors is that you have to carry all the other colors along, creating a rather thick and stiff seam at the inner leg. I tried a variety of things to make this seam as bulk-free as possible, but there’s really no way to carry four strands along without ending up with something that looks like this:

Grumperina had an interesting series of posts not too long ago (late March - early April 2008, to be exact) about how you can knit single-color stripes in spirals, thereby avoiding the pesky seam. I find that my mind can only barely comprehend how this technique would work, and I didn’t think I could start it mid-leg, so no dice this time around. Maybe I’ll try it in the future, though.

In any event, the pants came out cute, which I suppose is all that matters. They did bias rather severely in the wash for reasons totally unknown to me. Can you see in this picture how one leg of every stitch is more pronounced than the other?

Strangely, they didn’t look like this before I washed them, nor was there any difference between Rebecca’s stitches and mine — they all biased. I suppose it has something to do with the pants being made up of tubes. And with the way the yarn (Louet Gems Pearl) is plied. It’s not terribly noticeable, though, so I’m just ignoring it.

Meanwhile, I started a little baby jumper for Rebecca’s impending baby, but it wasn’t working out and I had to rip it back. I have another idea I want to try, but I needed to get away from the cotton for a while, so I decided to make a white Baby Surprise Jacket. I’ve never made one before, and the idea of white wool and garter stitch appealed. This is how far I was yesterday:

Though I have stared intently at the diagram, I still have no idea what portion of the jacket this represents. I think it may be part of both sleeves and also the back neck. Or not. We shall see.

There are three things in this picture that ought to catch your eye. First, I finished a sock. Isn’t it pretty? You can see the picot hem in the corner of the picture, and it has a garter-stitch short-row heel that I learned how to do from Lucy Neatby. It is an all-round champ of a sock.

Second, I have painted toenails. I got a pedicure on Thursday with my friend Rebecca as part of our ritual preparations for the birth of her second baby later this month. I chose toenail polish to go with the sock. It’s important that you know about Rebecca’s baby because now that I have finished the Secret Design Project (!), the knitting around here will be All Rebecca All the Time for a while. Not only do I have plans to knit a teensy garment for the baby, I also told Rebecca that I would finish all of her unfinished knitting projects, which will entail knitting two sleeves for a sweater and 1.25 legs for a pair of baby pants. She’s due in three weeks, so I have to get moving!

The third thing you should take note of is that the sun is shining and there are flowers in the background. Non-dead flowers. Though it did frost a little last night, it would seem that spring is more or less here to stay. Thank goodness. My mom had a bunch of annuals delivered to me, and I got them planted today. It’s nice to see some bright pinks and purples when I look out the windows.

I didn’t get a chance last week to report on the knitting classes that I took at the Midwest Masters. (I’ve been working a lot.) I came out of the experience glad that I had tried it, but also fairly sure that knitting classes just aren’t for me, for a couple of reasons. First, I learn very easily from books. I don’t think I have ever encountered a stitch in Barbara Walker’s treasuries that I wanted to knit but could not execute. This makes me willing to try pretty much anything, and that attitude has exposed me to a lot of information about knitting already. It seems that these knitterly qualities are more rare than I had realized. In my brioche stitch class, for example, I was the only one in the class who had already made something (a scarf) in brioche stitch. In Lucy Neatby’s class, I had already done several of the things on the agenda on my own at home, and we didn’t get to other techniques that I was more interested in because it took us too long to get through those techniques I’d already been exposed to.

This brings me to the second reason knitting classes may not be for me: I have always had trouble in art/craft classes with getting finished ahead of the pack. When I was in elementary school, the art teacher gave me a hard time for "rushing" through the projects each week, but I was never trying to rush — I just worked fast! In the knitting classes, I found it a little draining to have to wait for everyone to learn something before we could move on to the next thing. In Janet Szabo’s brioche class, we were pretty much able to work at our own pace on the different types of stitches, which was great, but then I ended up feeling that I could have just followed the directions at home, rather than sitting in an uncomfortable chair in a conference room. So, yeah. It was a good experience, the teachers did a great job, the conference was well-run, but I probably won’t do it again next year.

Have any of you had similar experiences? Or taken a class so phenomenal that you’d urge me to try again?