<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wishing Didn&#8217;t Make It So</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ruthlessknitting.com/wishing-didnt-make-it-so/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ruthlessknitting.com/wishing-didnt-make-it-so</link>
	<description>a knitter&#039;s journal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 01:57:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mel</title>
		<link>http://ruthlessknitting.com/wishing-didnt-make-it-so#comment-1539</link>
		<dc:creator>mel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 00:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ruthlessknitting.ruthlessediting.com/wishing-didnt-make-it-so#comment-1539</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m impressed with your tenacity! And I think I can &#039;see&#039; the intent in my head - very cute. Maybe a more A-line shape would work better? I wonder if the stitch pattern at the top doesn&#039;t also encourage the ruffling with the purl row pulling in (though it doesn&#039;t look to be pulling in too much). Your face in that first shot is killing me - it says as much as your words do about how you feel with this one!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m impressed with your tenacity! And I think I can &#8216;see&#8217; the intent in my head &#8211; very cute. Maybe a more A-line shape would work better? I wonder if the stitch pattern at the top doesn&#8217;t also encourage the ruffling with the purl row pulling in (though it doesn&#8217;t look to be pulling in too much). Your face in that first shot is killing me &#8211; it says as much as your words do about how you feel with this one!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mishka</title>
		<link>http://ruthlessknitting.com/wishing-didnt-make-it-so#comment-1538</link>
		<dc:creator>Mishka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 21:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ruthlessknitting.ruthlessediting.com/wishing-didnt-make-it-so#comment-1538</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m just seeing this from London, so I&#039;m late commenting. I agree with others that it has potential, but I&#039;m not sure I agree with you about going to a smaller needle on the skirt, because that will give it less drape. I think Joanna&#039;s right that you should consider starting with fewer stitches and increasing more gradually. If you can give the skirt a better shape so it looks less &#039;pregnant,&#039; the difference in  the length might not be a problem. But is it sitting back on your shoulders like that because the back neck is built up too much? Hmm. What an interesting design challenge!! (Alternatively, don&#039;t forget that you can just leave it in the sweater chest until you need some black yarn. It&#039;s only knitting after all!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m just seeing this from London, so I&#8217;m late commenting. I agree with others that it has potential, but I&#8217;m not sure I agree with you about going to a smaller needle on the skirt, because that will give it less drape. I think Joanna&#8217;s right that you should consider starting with fewer stitches and increasing more gradually. If you can give the skirt a better shape so it looks less &#8216;pregnant,&#8217; the difference in  the length might not be a problem. But is it sitting back on your shoulders like that because the back neck is built up too much? Hmm. What an interesting design challenge!! (Alternatively, don&#8217;t forget that you can just leave it in the sweater chest until you need some black yarn. It&#8217;s only knitting after all!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ingrid</title>
		<link>http://ruthlessknitting.com/wishing-didnt-make-it-so#comment-1531</link>
		<dc:creator>Ingrid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 00:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ruthlessknitting.ruthlessediting.com/wishing-didnt-make-it-so#comment-1531</guid>
		<description>I like the top.  There are lots of tops with similar shaping in the shops at the moment (even when I was in Paris). I think that it might suit someone who has &quot;tummy issues&quot; (even if not pregnant).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the top.  There are lots of tops with similar shaping in the shops at the moment (even when I was in Paris). I think that it might suit someone who has &#8220;tummy issues&#8221; (even if not pregnant).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wanda</title>
		<link>http://ruthlessknitting.com/wishing-didnt-make-it-so#comment-1537</link>
		<dc:creator>Wanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 20:27:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ruthlessknitting.ruthlessediting.com/wishing-didnt-make-it-so#comment-1537</guid>
		<description>Hmm, that&#039;s definitely a knitting tale. Sorry it didn&#039;t turn out. I don&#039;t really have any suggestions for you. I&#039;m not really keen on the end result, but the initial top sounds like something that might not be my preference either way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, that&#8217;s definitely a knitting tale. Sorry it didn&#8217;t turn out. I don&#8217;t really have any suggestions for you. I&#8217;m not really keen on the end result, but the initial top sounds like something that might not be my preference either way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gwendolyn's mom</title>
		<link>http://ruthlessknitting.com/wishing-didnt-make-it-so#comment-1536</link>
		<dc:creator>Gwendolyn's mom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 19:30:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ruthlessknitting.ruthlessediting.com/wishing-didnt-make-it-so#comment-1536</guid>
		<description>Well, speaking as an expert on maternity tops, I think it is pretty cute.  Is the front longer than the back?  B/c that&#039;s what you&#039;re looking for in maternity tops-- longer fronts.*  Sorry that my suggestion led you to unhappiness. On my end, of course, I didn&#039;t even attempt it!

*Note: this is not a veiled attempt to acquire the top myself, unless, of course, you want it to be. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, speaking as an expert on maternity tops, I think it is pretty cute.  Is the front longer than the back?  B/c that&#8217;s what you&#8217;re looking for in maternity tops&#8211; longer fronts.*  Sorry that my suggestion led you to unhappiness. On my end, of course, I didn&#8217;t even attempt it!</p>
<p>*Note: this is not a veiled attempt to acquire the top myself, unless, of course, you want it to be. <img src='http://ruthlessknitting.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joanna</title>
		<link>http://ruthlessknitting.com/wishing-didnt-make-it-so#comment-1535</link>
		<dc:creator>Joanna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 18:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ruthlessknitting.ruthlessediting.com/wishing-didnt-make-it-so#comment-1535</guid>
		<description>Hmm... it seems to me like part of the problem is that the skirt sort of balloons out right where it meets the bodice.  Because of this, the ruffle-y effect of the wide skirt causes the bottom of the bodice to ruffle and pucker as well.  What if you picked up stitches for the skirt and worked a few inches straight, keeping the width the same as in the bodice, and then gradually increased stitches so the transition to the flared section wouldn&#039;t be so harsh?  (Unless that&#039;s what you did the first time around, in which case... I got nothing.)  Also, I like each of your colors individually, but I was very happy to get to the bottom of the post and see that you didn&#039;t go for the clown look after all... :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm&#8230; it seems to me like part of the problem is that the skirt sort of balloons out right where it meets the bodice.  Because of this, the ruffle-y effect of the wide skirt causes the bottom of the bodice to ruffle and pucker as well.  What if you picked up stitches for the skirt and worked a few inches straight, keeping the width the same as in the bodice, and then gradually increased stitches so the transition to the flared section wouldn&#8217;t be so harsh?  (Unless that&#8217;s what you did the first time around, in which case&#8230; I got nothing.)  Also, I like each of your colors individually, but I was very happy to get to the bottom of the post and see that you didn&#8217;t go for the clown look after all&#8230; <img src='http://ruthlessknitting.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan B</title>
		<link>http://ruthlessknitting.com/wishing-didnt-make-it-so#comment-1534</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 17:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ruthlessknitting.ruthlessediting.com/wishing-didnt-make-it-so#comment-1534</guid>
		<description>Well, I kinda&#039; see what you mean.  But it has major major major potential, that&#039;s for certain!

It might be interesting to take the sweater as a base and let the design group loose on it - see all of the different variations and changes that they would make - even if it were only sketched out on paper!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I kinda&#8217; see what you mean.  But it has major major major potential, that&#8217;s for certain!</p>
<p>It might be interesting to take the sweater as a base and let the design group loose on it &#8211; see all of the different variations and changes that they would make &#8211; even if it were only sketched out on paper!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eSSKnits</title>
		<link>http://ruthlessknitting.com/wishing-didnt-make-it-so#comment-1533</link>
		<dc:creator>eSSKnits</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 17:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ruthlessknitting.ruthlessediting.com/wishing-didnt-make-it-so#comment-1533</guid>
		<description>Whatever said, you know what? I kinda like it. And I think it gives a young look.
Anyways, if you are so disappointed, why not frog the skirt and make it again?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whatever said, you know what? I kinda like it. And I think it gives a young look.<br />
Anyways, if you are so disappointed, why not frog the skirt and make it again?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: desiknitter</title>
		<link>http://ruthlessknitting.com/wishing-didnt-make-it-so#comment-1532</link>
		<dc:creator>desiknitter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 14:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ruthlessknitting.ruthlessediting.com/wishing-didnt-make-it-so#comment-1532</guid>
		<description>Oh no! I&#039;m so sorry it turned out this way - your expression gives away your irritation at it all. Even though I don&#039;t think it looks that bad, really, you&#039;re right about the puckering. Right now I think it&#039;s best if it stays in a time out in the closet, because no matter what you do to it you&#039;re going to be annoyed, no?

But I think the maternity-top-with-short-rows is a good idea (maybe in the fall, after some months have passed:-)) - the maths is not that difficult. You might not even have to reknit the whole skirt. Maybe this will help:

Figure out what the height difference between front and back will be; Multiply that length by your row gauge; you have the number of rows in which to fit the short rows.
Divide that number by half, and you have the number of wraps.
Subtract your bust-point to bust-point measurement from the length of the front; say it&#039;s 19-9 = 10 inches.
Divide by 2 = 5 inches. Your wraps will be fitted into 5 inches on both edges of the front.
Divide 5 by your stitch gauge. This will tell you how many stitches apart to keep the wraps.
Start the short rows at the beginning of the RS.
All this I just learnt from Maggie Righetti!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh no! I&#8217;m so sorry it turned out this way &#8211; your expression gives away your irritation at it all. Even though I don&#8217;t think it looks that bad, really, you&#8217;re right about the puckering. Right now I think it&#8217;s best if it stays in a time out in the closet, because no matter what you do to it you&#8217;re going to be annoyed, no?</p>
<p>But I think the maternity-top-with-short-rows is a good idea (maybe in the fall, after some months have passed:-)) &#8211; the maths is not that difficult. You might not even have to reknit the whole skirt. Maybe this will help:</p>
<p>Figure out what the height difference between front and back will be; Multiply that length by your row gauge; you have the number of rows in which to fit the short rows.<br />
Divide that number by half, and you have the number of wraps.<br />
Subtract your bust-point to bust-point measurement from the length of the front; say it&#8217;s 19-9 = 10 inches.<br />
Divide by 2 = 5 inches. Your wraps will be fitted into 5 inches on both edges of the front.<br />
Divide 5 by your stitch gauge. This will tell you how many stitches apart to keep the wraps.<br />
Start the short rows at the beginning of the RS.<br />
All this I just learnt from Maggie Righetti!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

